Monday, July 30, 2018

How to prove adverse possession

How to prove adverse possession? How does a person claim adverse possession? Do we have a case for adverse possession? How do you file a claim for adverse possession?


What do you need to know about adverse possession?

It must be continuous over a period of time. In California and some other. In order to claim ownership of land by adverse possession there are a number of elements you must prove. Foremost among these is proving you have had factual possession of the land and that you had the intention to possess said land.


There must be a sufficient degree of exclusive physical control over the land and it is generally considered to show such control you must exclude all others. However, this was not the case in the recent decision in Thorpe v Frank. See full list on hughjames.


Mrs Thorpe was the owner of a semi-detached bungalow.

Mr and Mrs Frank owned the adjoining bungalow. The case ended up in the Court of Appeal where it was decided that repaving of the forecourt could amount to possession to support a claim for adverse possession. The land in issue had always been open plan in character due in part to covenants which restrained fencing and building work.


Smith LJ commented “She made it readily appear that the land was part of the curtilage of No. On that basis, there could hardly be a clearer act of possession”. Property and land owners, however, should be aware of the need to keep the Land Registry informed of their correct contact details. It is also important to maintain a sufficient degree of knowledge of the character of the land to recognise if any substantial changes are made by another party.


It is easier to notice a fence or a wall where it shouldn’t be rather than different surfacing but this could be sufficient for someone to prove adverse possession. According to attorney Harry J. Garrity, government bodies favor the use of land over disuse. Proving adverse possession is not always easy. In this Land Court decision, a claimant asked for adverse possession on the grounds that he had performed extensive landscaping of the disputed property for the past twenty years, including weekly mowing, seeding, and lawn maintenance activities. Adverse Possession Claims.


Casaly Discussion of elements of and defenses to adverse possession. Your possession must be adverse to the owner’s claim, in other words without the owner’s consent. Other helpful evidence can include testimony from neighbors who lived near the property, photographs, and receipts for any work done on the property.


An adverse possession is ineffective if the possessor verbally (or otherwise) concedes the fact that the owner is the “real” owner of the property and that he or she is just the possessor.

Common examples of adverse possession include continuous use of a private road or driveway, or agricultural development of an unused parcel of land. In such a case, the possession is not considered to be hostile. One of the best ways to prove you have physical possession of the land is to fence off or otherwise enclose the land. The definition of “hostile” is considerably different depending on the state.


In Maine, for example, the squatter must be aware that he or she is trespassing. Basically, all the states have the same law (it comes from common law)…the difference is length (how long you have to possess adversely). One cannot be permitted to raise mutually inconsistent pleas at different stages of the suit to base his claim as sharer in ancestral property and other plea based on adverse possession. Plea as to adverse possession and claim thereof cannot commence unless claimant denounces his title claimed as sharer in joint family.


Nonetheless, in order to win a case of adverse possession , the claimant must prove each of the following five elements. A person claiming adverse possession must show an ability to control the land and his or her intent to exclude others from such control. Possession to be adverse must be possession by a person who does not acknowledge the other’s right but denies them.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.